Seminar report: "Clontarf, Orkney and the Age of Piracy in the Late Viking Age"

On the 5^th of February 2015, the UCD Archaeology Society welcomed Dr. James Barrett, from the Institute of Archaeological Research at the University of Cambridge.

His presentation was titled, ‘Clontarf, Orkney and the Power of Piracy in the Late Viking Age’.

Dr. Barrett began his presentation to us, by speaking of the first known record we have of the Earldom of Orkney, which was that of Earl Sigurd, evident in the Annals of Ulster. He posed the questions around which his seminar would be based.

These questions were:

• Was the Earldom of Orkney comparatively wealthy and powerful?
• If so, how?
• What implications do the answers have to wider economic patterns in the Irish and North Seas between 900 AD and 1200?

The Earldom of Orkney included north mainland Scotland and Shetland.  He gave a brief example of wealth and power from Orkney by speaking about the Burry Hoard from c977-1010. At the time there was no actual coinage in Orkney, so it is widely believed that silver arm rings which were discovered, were used as the main standard unit of exchange.

The rest of his seminar was focused around these points and ideas with particular reference to the two main sites in which he had a part in excavating. These were Quoygrew and The Brough of Deerness. Quoygrew was an Island of Westray while The Brough of Deerness was a tidal island and a Chieftain stronghold.

He spoke of the economic boom, which took place at Quoygrew in the 11^th and 12^th Century. This boom was a feature of all parts of their economy, including agricultural, pastural and marine. There was large scale evidence of fish bones, mostly cod, dating back to the 11^th and 12^th century. There is evidence of an increase in dairying from this time, with a focus on the culling of neonatal calves. This is evident from the discovery of the bones of new born calves dating back to a period between the 10^th and 12^th centuries. There is also evidence at Quoygrew of the production and exportation of butter. Butter is believed to have served many purposes at the time, including for fat and for industrial purposes such as a lubricant for wheels.

There is also evidence at this site of imported material culture, most of which has come from Norway. This is evident in the discoveries of steatite vessels, hones and combs. This develops the idea that trade links had been established between the Northern Worlds. Dr. Barrett discovered that the inhabitants of Quoygrew at the time tended to use vessels instead of ceramics.

When speaking on piracy associated with Orkney, he presented us with several examples of where this piracy took place. These examples were:

• 1014 Battle of Clontarf, Ireland
• 1058 Magnus Haraldsson’s invasion of England
• 1066 Harald Hardradis’ England invasion
• 1138 Battle of Standard, Yorkshire
• 1171 Askell Mac Turcaill’s attempt to retake Dublin
• 1194 Battle of Florvag, near Bergen

He spoke of evidence where pirates associated with Orkney decided to leave and seek employment in Norway in an attempt at rebellion. This led to the Earl going to Norway the following year to submit to the kings’ rule, in an attempt to maintain his position. Following this submission Shetland was taken away from the Earls rule, royal officials were put in several estates of the Earldom.

When speaking of the Brough of Deerness, he gave a brief description of its characteristics and layout. It was a tidal island with 30 buildings. One of these buildings was a chapel. The layout suggests that it was processional in its plan, with two front buildings and a long walkway towards the rest of the settlement. This layout is believed to be one of the reasons why history has interpreted the Brough of Deerness as a monastic site. This interpretation also comes from the discovery of both a church and beehive like huts in the same settlement. The houses in the settlement were three aisled houses and pit houses, well structured with four posts. The settlement itself was a defensive one, set up facing eastwards so as they could spot all approaching threats.

Dr. Barrett spoke of the Brough of Deerness possessing evidence of several different examples of material culture, all imported, from Norway, the Baltic and Irish Seas and from Anglo Saxon settlements. A major problem with these discoveries is that it is very hard to date them, as the settlement was built on top of a promontory fort. This has resulted in findings from both settlements making it difficult to differentiate between the two.

One example Dr. Barrett used to show the trade between the Northern Isles and the Irish Isles was in the 10^th century where Irish pins on Norwegian graves were replaced by local copies. In the 11^th and 12 centuries however we see a change in trade patterns between these two Isles. Irish trade oriented to Chester, Bristol and France, while Norwegian trade became local and to both Scottish and English Ports. 

By Paul Kingston

Seminar series report 2014/15: Clontarf, Orkney, and the age of piracy in the late Viking age

On the 5^th of February 2015, the UCD Archaeology Society welcomed Dr. James Barrett, from the Institute of Archaeological Research at the University of Cambridge.

His presentation was titled, ‘Clontarf, Orkney and the Power of Piracy in the Late Viking Age’.

Dr. Barrett began his presentation to us, by speaking of the first known record we have of the Earldom of Orkney, which was that of Earl Sigurd, evident in the Annals of Ulster.

He posed the questions around which his seminar would be based.

These questions were:

• Was the Earldom of Orkney comparatively wealthy and powerful?
• If so, how?
• What implications do the answers have to wider economic patterns in the Irish and North Seas between 900 AD and 1200?

The Earldom of Orkney included north mainland Scotland and Shetland.  He gave a brief example of wealth and power from Orkney by speaking about the Burry Hoard from c977-1010. At the time there was no actual coinage in Orkney, so it is widely believed that silver arm rings which were discovered, were used as the main standard unit of exchange.

The rest of his seminar was focused around these points and ideas with particular reference to the two main sites in which he had a part in excavating. These were Quoygrew and The Brough of Deerness. Quoygrew was an Island of Westray while The Brough of Deerness was a tidal island and a Chieftain stronghold.

He spoke of the economic boom, which took place at Quoygrew in the 11^th and 12^th Century. This boom was a feature of all parts of their economy, including agricultural, pastural and marine. There was large scale evidence of fish bones, mostly cod, dating back to the 11^th and 12^th century. There is evidence of an increase in dairying from this time, with a focus on the culling of neonatal calves. This is evident from the discovery of the bones of new born calves dating back to a period between the 10^th and 12^th centuries. There is also evidence at Quoygrew of the production and exportation of butter. Butter is believed to have served many purposes at the time, including for fat and for industrial purposes such as a lubricant for wheels.

There is also evidence at this site of imported material culture, most of which has come from Norway. This is evident in the discoveries of steatite vessels, hones and combs. This develops the idea that trade links had been established between the Northern Worlds. Dr. Barrett discovered that the inhabitants of Quoygrew at the time tended to use vessels instead of ceramics.

When speaking on piracy associated with Orkney, he presented us with several examples of where this piracy took place. These examples were:

• 1014 Battle of Clontarf, Ireland
• 1058 Magnus Haraldsson’s invasion of England
• 1066 Harald Hardradis’ England invasion
• 1138 Battle of Standard, Yorkshire
• 1171 Askell Mac Turcaill’s attempt to retake Dublin
• 1194 Battle of Florvag, near Bergen

He spoke of evidence where pirates associated with Orkney decided to leave and seek employment in Norway in an attempt at rebellion. This led to the Earl going to Norway the following year to submit to the kings’ rule, in an attempt to maintain his position. Following this submission Shetland was taken away from the Earls rule, royal officials were put in several estates of the Earldom.

When speaking of the Brough of Deerness, he gave a brief description of its characteristics and layout. It was a tidal island with 30 buildings. One of these buildings was a chapel. The layout suggests that it was processional in its plan, with two front buildings and a long walkway towards the rest of the settlement. This layout is believed to be one of the reasons why history has interpreted the Brough of Deerness as a monastic site. This interpretation also comes from the discovery of both a church and beehive like huts in the same settlement. The houses in the settlement were three aisled houses and pit houses, well structured with four posts. The settlement itself was a defensive one, set up facing eastwards so as they could spot all approaching threats.

Dr. Barrett spoke of the Brough of Deerness possessing evidence of several different examples of material culture, all imported, from Norway, the Baltic and Irish Seas and from Anglo Saxon settlements. A major problem with these discoveries is that it is very hard to date them, as the settlement was built on top of a promontory fort. This has resulted in findings from both settlements making it difficult to differentiate between the two.

One example Dr. Barrett used to show the trade between the Northern Isles and the Irish Isles was in the 10^th century where Irish pins on Norwegian graves were replaced by local copies. In the 11^th and 12 centuries however we see a change in trade patterns between these two Isles. Irish trade oriented to Chester, Bristol and France, while Norwegian trade became local and to both Scottish and English Ports.

By Paul Kingston

Seminar series, lecture 5: Wrapping up the Late Neolithic in Orkney

                 This weeks seminar was entitled “ Evolution of house societies in Orkney questions of Mythopraxis and Mythologization”,  presented by Prof. Colin Richards, University of Manchester. The first topic discussed was “house societies”. He demonstrated how this idea could be translated into an understanding of Orcadian society. House societies are organised around dwellings rather then lineage. These societies were highly volatile and social status was extremely important. The development of a house society in Orkney is visible by studying their houses. In the case of Stonehall, the series of early Neolithic houses are scattered meters apart from one another. As we move through time these house move closer together, in the case of the houses of Barnhouse they are next to each other. Finally in the case of the settlement of Skara Brae the houses are physically touching each other. This is demonstrating the need for the community to come closer and try to create a stable community.
                 An interesting feature of the Orcadian society that Prof. Colin Richards noted was its transition from wood to stone houses. It has long been assumed that stone houses were the norm in Orkney due to a lack of wood to construct houses with. However recent excavations have in fact proved that people in the early Neolithic constructed circular wooded houses, examples of which have been discovered at a site called Bram of Smerquey. These houses have been dated and surprisingly, they are contemporary with the stone-built tombs. This demonstrates an odd transition as in Britain and Ireland it has been accepted that mortuary tombs can be seen as a reflection of houses. As they modelled there tombs based upon their own houses, turning the house of the living into the house of the dead. However in Orkney there seems to be a change whereby they begin by constructing there houses of wood and then shift to using stone. This shows that the people began modelling their houses to look like the tombs they built. Thus demonstrating Orcadian society was very complex and was regionally different from the rest of Britain.
                  The final topic discussed was a concept caller “wrapping”. Professor Richards has begun to apply this idea to the late Neolithic Orkney based upon ethnographical studies in Polynesia. He began by showing a series of images that demonstrated wrapping such as wrapping a Christmas present. The idea of wrapping can be seen in different cultures whereby they believe that it is important to wrap sacred places to create a barrier between the people and the ancestors and deities. This can be done by building walls around a building or in some cases people wrapped sacred temples with cloths. Richards believes that this idea can be applied to understanding the megalithic structures of Orkney. In the case of Maeshowe, Gordon Childe discovered a series of walls under the mound with no obvious structural functions. He asked the question: is this an example of the people attempting to wrap this monument? Were the people attempting to protect themselves from powerful spirits within the mound? We may never fully understand however one thing is certain is this seminar left many who attended the seminar a lot of food for thought.

By Katherine McCormack